Ads! They’re great.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8 other subscribers

We here at CDL Love The Ladies

Legalese

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Claire De Lunacy is my own, personal weblog. The opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any employer (past or present). I am not responsible for the content in comments other than those made by me, or other online content to which I may link.

All content on this blog is property of its respective owner(s). All original content, and derivatives thereof, is/are my property and may NOT be used elsewhere without the author's permission.

Everyone knows plagiarists are creatively bankrupt, spiritually barren and extremely likely to be infected with a veritable cornucopia of incurable STDs as punishment for their sins.

CUNNING LINGUIST: Prisoners of Language

No Gravatar

CUNNING LINGUIST FOR JUNE 11th, 2013

It occurs to me this morning that the source of most of humanity’s problems—all the “isms” with which we burden ourselves, including racism, sexism, classism—are really an issue of grammar.

“Oh, Claire, that’s preposterous, you addlepated nannygoat!” you cry (assuming you have taken your slang from an Elizabethan colonel with a handlebar mustache and a name like “Reginald Mockworthy.”).

But au contraire, mon tres bon frere. Because consider this: everybody likes to be the subject, but nobody likes to be the OBJECT. We all want to be the captains of the S.S. Sentence, verbing our way around the vast adjective sea, inflicting our will on the objects who pass in front of or beneath our hull.

We want to be the ones positioning the prepositions. We want to be the ones controlling those dependent clauses and helpless fragments.

We want to DO, rather than be done TO.

“Sam picked up the ball.”

“Sam picked up the check.”

“Sam picked up that chick.”

Sam’s pretty happy to do these things. But he’s not so happy when:

“Sam was picked up by the Czech.”

“Sam was shot down by the young lady he fancied.”

“Sam was hit with the ball.”

Now, one can argue that we are prisoners of language, because it is both an instinctive and cultural modus operandi with regard to personal expression and interpersonal communication. We are all—no matter what Lifetime movies or Hallmark cards tell us—alone inside our heads, struggling to express ourselves while simultaneously seeking (let us hope) to understand others. It’s easy to say that selfishness and egocentrism are quintessential components of self-expression, because we are all subject to the prison of three cubic feet of blood and meat and bone.

But our brains give us another gift as well; the ability to overcome our selfishness and our isolating, literally idiotic (as the Greeks would have it) behavior.

We needn’t embrace an “othering” worldview. A view which says, “only I, or my family, or my peer group, or my religion, or my sinister group of fellows with whom I have entered into a tontine, are real. Everything, and everyONE, else is an object I may manipulate, create, destroy or ignore at my leisure.”

We have a choice.

Thoughts become words. Words become actions. Is the solution to modify our thoughts? Perhaps introduce some creepy Orwellian modifications to improve our regard for the collective welfare of our species and our planet?

I think not.

Language may be the sweet flower that blooms from the soil of one’s mental garden, but it is up to each gardener to till, and to tend, and to plant. It is up to older, more experienced gardeners to guide the youngest as they begin to work their own plots, so the bounty that emerges is not tainted or twisted or stained with lingering and irrational hate.

Aristotle once said, “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.” And if we want to eliminate the darker blooms that besmirch our collective garden on this blue rock—if we want to weed out the nasty briars that encircle our limbs like chains—we must first strike the weeds of ignorance and fear from our own beds.

Free will is a bitch, huh? But the results speak for themselves…if we’re lucky.

And now, because I hate to leave you without a visual aid, here is Bianca Beauchamp, illustrating the importance of proper gardening. Or something like that. Remember, I was just talking about gardens, and she…oh, you’re not even reading this bit, anyway.

tumblr_mlgn7i9IrA1qi6txwo3_1280 tumblr_m62t4yHnjf1qgu2vjo1_1280 tumblr_mlgn7i9IrA1qi6txwo9_1280

 

 

NEXT WEEK IN CUNNING LINGUIST: That bit about talking animals I mentioned last week, before I forgot and did this instead.

HOW TO WRITE, PART 845: CHOOSING AN ANTAGONIST

Long ago, in a galaxy far, far kawaii...

Long ago, in a galaxy far, far kawaii… (Source)

 

Life is great with friends, but it’s always more…interesting…with enemies. To that end, when you’re crafting a narrative, the person who’s creating trouble for your plucky hero or heroine is at LEAST as important as the heroine or hero themselves. After all, your antagonist (from the Latin for “James Moriarty”) is responsible for generating all that white-knuckle-inducing, edge-of-your-seat-positioning conflict that turns a little wheel I like

Read the rest: HOW TO WRITE, PART 845: CHOOSING AN ANTAGONIST

CUNNING LINGUIST: THE FUTURE OF MAGIC (and some gratuitous Emma Watson pics)

Emma Watson is hot. Duh.

CUNNING LINGUIST—JUNE 6th, 2013:

Consider, if you will, a time far in the future, when English (having enjoyed a long and turbulent reign as the lingua franca of the modern world) is splintered and evolves (perhaps) into several descendant languages, much as Romance languages evolved from their more complicated ancestor, Latin.

Now, take this consideration a step further and imagine that English is preserved in only a few places for everyday discourse, its once-fluid, agglomerative, and acquisitive

Read the rest: CUNNING LINGUIST: THE FUTURE OF MAGIC (and some gratuitous Emma Watson pics)